[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: question about syntax_def



"Brian K. White" wrote:
> 
> Apparently I'm not getting something about the syntax of the syntax_def
> file. I'm trying to define a BASIC called BBX (www.basis.com) and I
> can't figure out how to work the "Comment from here to end of line"
> my syntax_def, with bbx PRO/5 support, and some sample bbx code, and a
> partial screen shot depicting the problem are at
> http://www.squonk.net/users/linut/xwpeprob.html

GRR! that's:
http://www.squonk.net/users/linut/linux/xwpeprob.html

actually I'll probably just go make it so the typo is actually valid
too...

> Can someone tell me if I'm not doing it righ, or is it just a 'feature'?
> Not a problem if it's 'feature',at least I'll know to settle for what
> I've managed to get so far, which is %300 better than the basic
> interpretr!
> Note: I'm not trying to deal with the line numbers, just the REM
> statements. According to the man page, it seems like they should be able
> to work just like "//" does.
> 
> I figured attaching 30k of files might be just barely into the realm of
> annoying, so I just post a url :)
> 
> --
> 
> "A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without
> bricks tied to its head."
> Brian~


-- 

"A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without
bricks tied to its head."
Brian~