[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Xwpe 1.5.23a

To: xwpe@cs.rpi.edu (Xwpe)
Subject: Re: Xwpe 1.5.23a
From: Dennis Payne <dulsi@identicalsoftware.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 16:28:34 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <38E2E95F.92264017@squonk.net> from "Brian K. White" at Mar 30, 0 00:42:55 am
Sender: owner-xwpe@cs.rpi.edu
Sender: owner-xwpe@identicalsoftware.com

> > Of particular interest to me is the number of people who don't have the
> > tempnam() function.  (Already asked about zlib and didn't hear anyone
> > complain about making it required.)

> looks like it's here on SCO Open Server 5.0.5
> does this definition look alright ?

Yup that's it.  That will generate a good temporary directory name instead
of the using the process id which can be predicted.

Dennis Payne
dulsi@identicalsoftware.com

References:
- Re: Xwpe 1.5.23a
  - From: "Brian K. White" <linut@squonk.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Xwpe 1.5.23a
Next by Date: Some Thoughts
Prev by thread: Re: Xwpe 1.5.23a
Next by thread: Some Thoughts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread